I learned a lot from these presentations. Projects like Jim's were pretty good. I knew about the mystical weapon but when he analyzed it and talked about the different and deep mythologies each weapon has before it reaches the hero. That was pretty neat. Similarly, Kyle's thesis that we all want a mystic weapon but don't want our enemies to have one was intriguing as well. I think my favorite presentation thus far was Steve Nisi's because I am a big fan of Catcher in the Rye. I've only read it one time, but his presentation was definitely entertaining. He and I basically had the same thesis or paper, where we applied the traditional hero's cycle to an alternative character, but I think his was probably more insightful than mine. Henry also had a great presentation. I am also a big fan of film noir and his idea that the protagonist or the detective in these films doesn't change, while the events and situations around him to do was quite insightful. It is true, the classic detective doesn't change and that's pretty cool, especially compared to another typical hero that learns a moral and becomes a nicer person throughout the course of the story.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comments:
I agree with your point about how Kyle's point about us wanting a mystical weapon, but not our enemies. That was pretty interesting. I haven't read Catcher in the Rye, but after listening to Steve's presentation, I think i would like to. It was interesting that a character from a book written in 1951 can relate to Napoleon Dynamite. I enjoyed your presentation today as well because, like i have said in all of these comments, I enjoy hearing about modern heroes and their journeys. Not just the typical presentations on Othello and Luke Skywalker.
Post a Comment